Crisis in Syria: Is Further Intervention Necessary?

On Friday, April 13, 2018, the United States accused Syrian president Bashar Al Assad of using chemical weapons to poison his own people in an attack on the town of Douma that left around 70 people dead. As a response, U.S. President Donald Trump, along with the U.K. and France,ordered air strikes on alleged chemical weapons sites.These airstrikes prompted a debate on whether or not the U.S. and its allies should take further military action in the region under the hashtag #SyriaStrikes.

 

 

 

In case of further attacks by Syria and her allies, some believe that military intervention is necessary in holding the Assad regime accountable for war crimes.

 

 

On the opposing side, others believe that the West should stay out of the conflict altogether, suggesting that the Western world lacks concrete proof that the Assad regime carried out this attack.

 

 

The opposition also believes that the crisis in Syria follows a similar pattern of previous wars that have been costly and unsuccessful, such as the Vietnam and Iraq Wars.

 

Do you believe that further intervention is necessary in the Syrian crisis, or should the United States and its allies remain neutral?

Leave a Reply