Author: Amanda Sterling

2016 Presidential Candidates: What Platforms Should They Use?

People are inundated with information from various media all day long. Between Facebook, TV ads, and real life interactions, it can be difficult to grab someone’s attention. With the upcoming election, how can political candidates grab the attention of voters? The solution is through social media platforms that voters are using, but which ones should candidates use to engage with voters?

Media Richness Theory

In 1980, Daft and Lengel created a theory of media richness. In essence, their theory states that different types of media have different levels of richness. Face-to-face interactions are the richest because individuals can receive direct feedback and read not just verbal cues, but the visual cues from a speaker’s body language (Daft and Lengel 1980). Studies show that only 7% of information in face-to-face interactions comes from what someone is saying: the bulk of information is delivered via verbal cues (i.e. intonation) and body language (Daft and Lengel 1980). 

My Recommendations

Candidates are already aware the power face-to-face interactions have, but can not engage with every single voter that way. There are several social media platforms available that mimic face-to-face interactions and make it easier for candidates to communicate with voters. Here are my recommendations for social media platforms that candidates can use:

  • SnapChat- One of the best aspects of SnapChat is that it’s great for younger voter demographics. Millenials love SnapChat and its short video/photo format. It is also incredibly easy to provide live updates from events.

  • Facebook- Using Facebook has several benefits. The new livestream video feature makes it possible for voters to watch candidates’ events live. In addition, Facebook Messenger for Pages makes it so voters can message candidates’ social media teams and interact with them directly.
  • Periscope–  This app is now linked with Twitter so candidates can post live videos. It also makes it easier for news organizations from across the globe to access candidates’ content.

Clearly, face-to-face interactions are the best way to engage voters, but the social media platforms above can increase candidates’ reach in a similar manner. What other platforms or techniques would you recommend to the 2016 Presidential candidates?

Sources:

Daft, Richard and Robert Lengel. Information Richness. A New Approach to Managerial Behavior and Organizational Design. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University College of Business Administration, 1980.

Raedle, Joe. Image from Getty Images News.

Read more "2016 Presidential Candidates: What Platforms Should They Use?"

#MetLogo: Twitter Criticizes the Met’s New Logo

On March 1, the Metropolitan Museum of Art changed all of their logos from this iconic logo:

View post on imgur.com

to this:

View post on imgur.com

to celebrate the opening of the Met Breuer, the Met’s new contemporary art museum, on March 18. Designers, Met aficionados, and interested observers alike jumped to Twitter to voice their love or hatred of the new logo.

(Spoiler alert: Most people on Twitter hated the new logo, and initially, I did too.)

Now, I think some of the remarks above are a little too harsh. These days, I find myself agreeing with the remarks below.

Personally, I think the logo makes sense with the Met’s transition to a contemporary art museum with a more universal audience. What do you think? Has the Met nailed it or failed it with its new logo? Share your thoughts with me on Twitter (@amsterli)!

 

Read more "#MetLogo: Twitter Criticizes the Met’s New Logo"

Video: What is a Curator?

This is a video I made for my Social Media course at the Newhouse School of Public Communications at Syracuse University. I’m a museum professional at Syracuse University and the number one question I get asked about my life as a museum professional is: What is a Curator? I briefly explain what curators do in […]

Read more "Video: What is a Curator?"